In the one year since the collapse of Bear Stearns, the Federal Reserve has created the following "Alphabet Soup" programs to fight this epic debt and derivatives collapse:
1. Maiden Lane, LLC (I and II) For Bear Stearns bailout.
2. Term Auction Facility (TAF)
3. Central Bank Liquidity Swaps (CBLS)
4. Primary Dealer Credit Facility (PDCF)
5. Term Securities Lending Facility (TSLF)
6. Term Securities Lending Options Program (TOP)
7. Asset-Backed Commercial Paper MMF Liquidity Facility (AMLF)
8. Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF)
9. Money Market Investor Funding Facility (MMIFF)
10. Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF)
11. Outright ownership stake in AIG
12. Numerous other "loans" to JPM, Citi and BofA after the Lehman Bros. collapse
13. Outright monetization of Fannie/Freddie MBS and debt
14. Outright monetization of U.S. Treasuries
15. Expansion of TALF to support the soon-to-be-announced Treasury/FDIC/Fed program to offload dead, toxic "assets" from banks.
Total amount flung or committed to be flung by the Federal Reserve:
Approximately ELEVEN TRILLION FIATSCOS!
In addition to the massive, unprecedented, insane amount of fiatsco-flinging by the Fed outlined above, the U.S. government has also been busy creating the following programs:
1. The original stimulus bill of 150 billion fiatscos which handed out checks directly to the sheeple
2. The "Bazooka Bill" of 800 billion fiatscos to bailout Fannie, Freddie and the FHLBs
3. The Troubled Asset Relief Program of 750 billion fiatscos
4. The second stimulus bill of 750 billion fiatscos
Total amount of flung or committed to be flung by Congress:
TWO-POINT-THREE TRILLION FIATSCOS!
...which brings the grand total of all fiatscos flung or promised to:
THIRTEEN-POINT-THREE TRILLION FIATSCOS!!!
So, after an entire YEAR of the Fed and Congress flinging fiat at the debt and derivatives collapse AND the total amount now OVER thirteen trillion fiatscos, here we sit.
Now, here are my questions:
1. WHY HASN'T THE PROBLEM BEEN SOLVED?
2. Why aren't the banks now solvent?
3. Why isn't lending back to 2005-2006 bubble levels?
4. Why have housing prices collapsed by thirty-percent?
5. Why are stock markets down fifty percent?
6. Why are so many businesses laying off workers and filing for bankruptcy?
And, I must admit that this massive, epic, unprecedented debt and derivatives collapse has exceeded even my gloomiest forecast--made in August, 2007--of three trillion fiatscos of debt destruction and ten trillion in derivatives decimation.
Furthermore, please keep in mind that I am ONLY counting the U.S. collapse, not the nearly-identical amount that Europe's financial systems have also melted down.
So, in actuality we are looking at:
OVER TWENTY TRILLION FIATSCOS IN DEBT AND DERIVATIVES COLLAPSE!
...worldwide. So far.
ALso, as I pointed out in a post yesterday, the central banks and governments haven't shown any sign that they will ever give up fighting this unprecedented worldwide collapse either. The U.S. Fed and federal government are in fact INCREASING their responses as opposed to backing off and allowing the collapse to run its course to the natural conclusion ("Great Disintegration I").
Moving forward to addressing the soon-to-be-announced Turbo Tax Timmy program to offload the dead, toxic "assets" STILL on the books of the banking system (which, as I pointed out above, SHOULD HAVE ALREADY BEEN DEALT WITH VIA ALL THESE PROGRAMS AND BAILOUTS), I can state with utmost certainty that this is nothing more than another attempt to offload on the taxpayer additional trillions of fiatscos of losses.
And you cant bet that we will NEVER be told exactly of what these "assets" consist, although I already know:
1. Completely worthless mortgages
2. Equally as worthless auto loans and leases
3. Just as worthless student loans
4. Other dead debt
5. All the myriad derivatives of the above (MBS/ABS, CDOs/Squareds/Cubeds/CDS) that were pyramided on top of the previously-listed dead debt
...all of which must total MORE than the thriteen trillion fiatscos flung or promised so far, or the financial system would have ALREADY been restored to order, right?
Right?
(Conclusion): We are so scroomed that it is becoming impossible to pretend otherwise anymore. Also, even IF the governments and central banks could possibly absorb all these losses, they will NEVER be able to either unwind all the dead debt and derivatives or, more importantly, re-incite the "Animal Spirits" required in the minds of the sheeple to bring the borrowing markets back to the:
FOUR TRILLION FIATSCOS PER YEAR, EVERY YEAR, YEAR-AFTER-YEAR
...amount required in the U.S. alone to keep the Ponzi Economy from continuing to implode, UNLESS TPTB decide to really pull the "Weimar/Zimbabwe Switch" and start maling one-hundred thousand fiatsco checks directly to the masses.
So, here are our stark choices:
1. Either "Great Disintegration I" continues despite all the efforts by TPTB (which it so far has)
...or:
2. TPTB manage to pull off "Weimar/Zimbabwe" for a few more years before we revert to #1 above
I wish I could come up with some other, more benign, scenario. But I can't.
link
Showing posts with label spock. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spock. Show all posts
23 March 2009
16 February 2009
While in "Pon Farr" Spock mauls gold bears
..today, I will only refute the writer's completely misguided missive and not accuse him of being an idiot or shill for fiat.
To wit:
12 Reasons To Start Shorting Gold
"It's decidedly contrarian. If a contrarian investor is someone who deliberately decides to go against the prevailing wisdom of other investors, shorting gold certainly fits the bill. Right now, everyone else is buying gold, or at least recommending it. If you have any doubt we've reached such fever pitch levels, consider No. 2."
(Spock): There isn't literally one sheeple in a hundred buying gold, even the phony "paper gold" ETF GLD. Sorry, but Joe Six Pack hasn't climbed on board the train yet.
"The infomercial factor. The best indicator of a turning point for any investment, in my experience, is infomercials. If an investment gets so popular it invades the pre-dawn hours with non-stop but-wait-there's-more offers, it's time to get out. And that's exactly what's happening now. So much so companies like Cash4Gold.com are invading primetime television. They even splurged for a Super Bowl ad spot. And they recruited washed-up celebrities Ed McMahon and M.C. Hammer to boot. In case you forgot, the Hammer filed bankruptcy in 1996. And Eddie boy almost lost his 7,000 square-foot, $6.5 million Beverly Hills pad to foreclosure. No offense, if you take investment cues from these two, you deserve to lose money."
(Spock): Wrong again. It is when you see the lambs lined up outside the coin dealers, flinging their fiatscos to BUY gold, not sell it, that you are in the "mania stage".
"There is always some truth in a rumor. Recent news reports suggested Germany, the world's second-largest holder of gold, was selling some from its vaults to trim its deficit. It turned out to be a rumor. But you gotta wonder if there's some truth behind it. After all, high gold prices would be an easy way to raise cash. In other words, the scenario is completely plausible. And if Germany's considering it, even remotely, so, too, are plenty of other deficit-ridden governments. It goes without saying that a government dumping supply on the market will send prices lower, quickly."
(Spock): Clearly this writer is unaware of the near-daily threats by central banks and the IMF to "Sell their gold, any day now, they swear". Yet it never happens.
"The gold-to-oil ratio is out of whack. Historically, an ounce of gold will buy you about 14 barrels of oil. But with oil around $40 per barrel, an ounce of gold gets you almost 23 barrels - a whopping 64% above the historical mean. If you believe in statistics, a reversion to the mean is imminent! "
(Spock): Oil can skyrocket at any time.
"So is the gold-to-silver ratio. Historically, an ounce of gold will buy you 31 ounces of silver. But now the ratio stands at 73 - an unbelievable 134% above the historical mean. Here, too, a reversion to the mean is imminent. And I'd rather place my bets on a 57% decrease in the price of gold, than silver more than doubling to make it happen."
(Spock): Silver has blasted off its recent lows by a stunning forty-percent. Compare that to the stock markets.
"The HGNSI index is too high at 60.9%. For the past 25 years, Hulbert Financial Digest has tracked the average recommended gold market exposure among a subset of gold-timing newsletters. It usually fleshes out around 32.6%. But now it rests at 60.9%, a level it's only exceeded 13% of the time. The key - Hulbert found an inverse correlation exists between his proprietary index and the short-term market direction of gold. In other words, if the index is high, like now, gold is headed lower."
(Spock): Notice that the writer only quotes Hulbert's interviews with goldbug newsletter writers. Trust me, the vast majority of the newsletter purveyors are still recommending "stocks for the long run".
"Trinkets drive demand, not governments or speculators. Nearly 75% of gold demand comes from the jewelry market. And if Indian brides balk at buying above $750 per ounce as the Bombay Bullion Association reports - India's gold imports cratered 81% in December - look out below. And don't be fooled into thinking investors (governments or speculators) will pick up the slack. As HSBC reports, rising demand from investors, particularly from ETFs, only offset half of the 33% decline in jewelry market demand since 2001."
(Spock): The demand for gold is skyrocketing all over the planet as people flee fiatscos. Period.
"What makes now “different?� If the global economic crisis keeps getting worse, as goldbugs like to point out, why hasn't gold tested last March's high of $1,030.80 per ounce? Or blown right by it? After all, gold is supposed to increase in value as economic conditions worsen. But it hasn't lived up to expectations, not one bit. And I don't think it ever will. Ultimately, when you factor in the massive amounts of stimulus being injected into the markets, on a global level, we're close to the worst of times… and the peak for gold."
(Spock): Without even addressing the known, well-documented fact of central bank interference in the otherwise free gold market (a fact the writer himself corroborates with his reference to Germany), the fact is that gold is one of the very few things on the planet that hasn't been destroyed by the deflationary debt and derivatives Ponzi collapse.
" Analysts love it. According to Bloomberg, 16 of 24 analysts surveyed by the London Bullion Market Association believe gold will reach a minimum of $1,032 per ounce this year. As we all know, analysts' track records are deplorable. Instead of just ignoring them, why not bet against them? The odds are definitely in our favor."
(Spock): Again, skewed methedology. Ask a thousand buy-side stock analysts and they will tell the sheeps to "Buy and hold" stocksl without exception.
"Hedge fund buying dried up. Institutional speculators (hedge funds) played a large part in gold's run-up. But 920 of them went Kaplooey last year, according to Hedge Fund Research, Inc. Not to mention, hundreds of others hemorrhaged capital as investors demanded their money back, while those left standing ratcheted down borrowing to close to nothing, according to Rasini & C., a London-based investment adviser. In the end, gold prices will eventually reflect the absence of these former heavyweights."
(Spock): Thousands of hedgies have gone Tango Uniform, yet gold is near its all-time fiatsco high. go figure.
"Gold is schizophrenic and the wrong personality is in control. Multiple motivations exist to buy gold including the desire for a safe haven, currency, adornment, raw material, or inflation hedge. But much like Treasuries, the bulk of buyers come from the safe haven camp today. And once the economy shows any signs of perking up, we can expect these same investors to flee for more risky assets. And don't be so quick to rule out a second half recovery… "
(Spock): Perhaps a "second half of the century" recovery is in the cards, but the writer is clearly clueless as to the fact that we are witnessing the "Great Disintegration I".
The Fed, the President, history and the Baltic Dry Index concur - the economy's on the mend. Despite dismal data, both the Fed and President Obama point to the current recession ending by the second half of 2009. Moreover, the average recession only lasts 14.4 months. So even if this one is longer than usual, we're still near the tail end of it. A fact underscored by the recent 61.4% rally in the Baltic Dry Index from its early December low. As I wrote in November 2008, the index is the first pure indicator of an uptick in global activity. And once the economy gets back into gear, the Fed will act quickly to reign in the money supply and curb inflation."
(Spock): The Fed, feds, other central banks and governments have flung well over twenty-trillion fiatscos at the collapse so far, with almost zero effect. This is not your father's recession but a once-in-history meltdown of the world's financial and economic system.
Spock Conclusion): Another misinformed writer who simply cannot comprehend the size and scope of this unprecedented debt and derivatives collapse.
link
To wit:
12 Reasons To Start Shorting Gold
"It's decidedly contrarian. If a contrarian investor is someone who deliberately decides to go against the prevailing wisdom of other investors, shorting gold certainly fits the bill. Right now, everyone else is buying gold, or at least recommending it. If you have any doubt we've reached such fever pitch levels, consider No. 2."
(Spock): There isn't literally one sheeple in a hundred buying gold, even the phony "paper gold" ETF GLD. Sorry, but Joe Six Pack hasn't climbed on board the train yet.
"The infomercial factor. The best indicator of a turning point for any investment, in my experience, is infomercials. If an investment gets so popular it invades the pre-dawn hours with non-stop but-wait-there's-more offers, it's time to get out. And that's exactly what's happening now. So much so companies like Cash4Gold.com are invading primetime television. They even splurged for a Super Bowl ad spot. And they recruited washed-up celebrities Ed McMahon and M.C. Hammer to boot. In case you forgot, the Hammer filed bankruptcy in 1996. And Eddie boy almost lost his 7,000 square-foot, $6.5 million Beverly Hills pad to foreclosure. No offense, if you take investment cues from these two, you deserve to lose money."
(Spock): Wrong again. It is when you see the lambs lined up outside the coin dealers, flinging their fiatscos to BUY gold, not sell it, that you are in the "mania stage".
"There is always some truth in a rumor. Recent news reports suggested Germany, the world's second-largest holder of gold, was selling some from its vaults to trim its deficit. It turned out to be a rumor. But you gotta wonder if there's some truth behind it. After all, high gold prices would be an easy way to raise cash. In other words, the scenario is completely plausible. And if Germany's considering it, even remotely, so, too, are plenty of other deficit-ridden governments. It goes without saying that a government dumping supply on the market will send prices lower, quickly."
(Spock): Clearly this writer is unaware of the near-daily threats by central banks and the IMF to "Sell their gold, any day now, they swear". Yet it never happens.
"The gold-to-oil ratio is out of whack. Historically, an ounce of gold will buy you about 14 barrels of oil. But with oil around $40 per barrel, an ounce of gold gets you almost 23 barrels - a whopping 64% above the historical mean. If you believe in statistics, a reversion to the mean is imminent! "
(Spock): Oil can skyrocket at any time.
"So is the gold-to-silver ratio. Historically, an ounce of gold will buy you 31 ounces of silver. But now the ratio stands at 73 - an unbelievable 134% above the historical mean. Here, too, a reversion to the mean is imminent. And I'd rather place my bets on a 57% decrease in the price of gold, than silver more than doubling to make it happen."
(Spock): Silver has blasted off its recent lows by a stunning forty-percent. Compare that to the stock markets.
"The HGNSI index is too high at 60.9%. For the past 25 years, Hulbert Financial Digest has tracked the average recommended gold market exposure among a subset of gold-timing newsletters. It usually fleshes out around 32.6%. But now it rests at 60.9%, a level it's only exceeded 13% of the time. The key - Hulbert found an inverse correlation exists between his proprietary index and the short-term market direction of gold. In other words, if the index is high, like now, gold is headed lower."
(Spock): Notice that the writer only quotes Hulbert's interviews with goldbug newsletter writers. Trust me, the vast majority of the newsletter purveyors are still recommending "stocks for the long run".
"Trinkets drive demand, not governments or speculators. Nearly 75% of gold demand comes from the jewelry market. And if Indian brides balk at buying above $750 per ounce as the Bombay Bullion Association reports - India's gold imports cratered 81% in December - look out below. And don't be fooled into thinking investors (governments or speculators) will pick up the slack. As HSBC reports, rising demand from investors, particularly from ETFs, only offset half of the 33% decline in jewelry market demand since 2001."
(Spock): The demand for gold is skyrocketing all over the planet as people flee fiatscos. Period.
"What makes now “different?� If the global economic crisis keeps getting worse, as goldbugs like to point out, why hasn't gold tested last March's high of $1,030.80 per ounce? Or blown right by it? After all, gold is supposed to increase in value as economic conditions worsen. But it hasn't lived up to expectations, not one bit. And I don't think it ever will. Ultimately, when you factor in the massive amounts of stimulus being injected into the markets, on a global level, we're close to the worst of times… and the peak for gold."
(Spock): Without even addressing the known, well-documented fact of central bank interference in the otherwise free gold market (a fact the writer himself corroborates with his reference to Germany), the fact is that gold is one of the very few things on the planet that hasn't been destroyed by the deflationary debt and derivatives Ponzi collapse.
" Analysts love it. According to Bloomberg, 16 of 24 analysts surveyed by the London Bullion Market Association believe gold will reach a minimum of $1,032 per ounce this year. As we all know, analysts' track records are deplorable. Instead of just ignoring them, why not bet against them? The odds are definitely in our favor."
(Spock): Again, skewed methedology. Ask a thousand buy-side stock analysts and they will tell the sheeps to "Buy and hold" stocksl without exception.
"Hedge fund buying dried up. Institutional speculators (hedge funds) played a large part in gold's run-up. But 920 of them went Kaplooey last year, according to Hedge Fund Research, Inc. Not to mention, hundreds of others hemorrhaged capital as investors demanded their money back, while those left standing ratcheted down borrowing to close to nothing, according to Rasini & C., a London-based investment adviser. In the end, gold prices will eventually reflect the absence of these former heavyweights."
(Spock): Thousands of hedgies have gone Tango Uniform, yet gold is near its all-time fiatsco high. go figure.
"Gold is schizophrenic and the wrong personality is in control. Multiple motivations exist to buy gold including the desire for a safe haven, currency, adornment, raw material, or inflation hedge. But much like Treasuries, the bulk of buyers come from the safe haven camp today. And once the economy shows any signs of perking up, we can expect these same investors to flee for more risky assets. And don't be so quick to rule out a second half recovery… "
(Spock): Perhaps a "second half of the century" recovery is in the cards, but the writer is clearly clueless as to the fact that we are witnessing the "Great Disintegration I".
The Fed, the President, history and the Baltic Dry Index concur - the economy's on the mend. Despite dismal data, both the Fed and President Obama point to the current recession ending by the second half of 2009. Moreover, the average recession only lasts 14.4 months. So even if this one is longer than usual, we're still near the tail end of it. A fact underscored by the recent 61.4% rally in the Baltic Dry Index from its early December low. As I wrote in November 2008, the index is the first pure indicator of an uptick in global activity. And once the economy gets back into gear, the Fed will act quickly to reign in the money supply and curb inflation."
(Spock): The Fed, feds, other central banks and governments have flung well over twenty-trillion fiatscos at the collapse so far, with almost zero effect. This is not your father's recession but a once-in-history meltdown of the world's financial and economic system.
Spock Conclusion): Another misinformed writer who simply cannot comprehend the size and scope of this unprecedented debt and derivatives collapse.
link
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)